Last edited: 16 April, 2013 - 00:36
Last edited: 15 February, 2011 - 20:21
Last edited: 30 November, 2014 - 16:53
Soegaard Wrote:This picture shows how the watch looked when I found it.Jens-Kristian
ross (at) baverstock (dot) me (dot) uk
Last edited: 10 April, 2015 - 15:20
clepsydra Wrote:IWC just brought back the truth into a watch that had been bastardized, if I can use the word.
Last edited: 27 October, 2013 - 09:32
clepsydra Wrote:Otherwise, IMHO, a complete Mark 11 that has seen actual service, must show her age; must remain as is - unpolished, and with a dial and hands showing the patina of time. But that is just me, others like their vintage watches looking like new. To each its own. No one is right, no one is wrong.
evan_nanos at yahoo.com
clepsydra Wrote:But that is just me.
Soegaard Wrote:I agree with you completely! With the Mark 11 there was no other choice, but I love the patina on my WWW.JK