Last edited: 12 March, 2011 - 07:13
Last edited: 4 January, 2013 - 22:35
Last edited: 4 November, 2014 - 19:30
MF Wrote:Would you feel the same about the name if you learned that the A2 part of the name was in fact based on movement enhancements designed and made by IWC (specifically with Richard Habring then of IWC as part of the team) some 20 years ago? Do you feel the same about the naming of watches when 95% or so have cases not made in-house' especially for other companies? Should those be renamed? IWC here is a rarity it's in-house case making.Do you feel that virtually all other movements' for 98% of all companies-- should be renamed because the critical parts -balances and hairsprings - are made by swatch subsidiaries ? Should those movements be renamed?To my thinking, a name is just a name. What matters is what the quality is.
Last edited: 24 September, 2011 - 15:37
MF Wrote:To my thinking, a name is just a name. What matters is what the quality is.
bodzio Wrote:Well, I guess it is all about expectations.
What you do may not be so important, but it is very important that you do it well. (my variation of a saying by Gandhi)
Last edited: 23 October, 2011 - 13:31
Last edited: 25 April, 2011 - 14:33