Simius Wrote:... I ask myself if such a great dial would attract less attention than a dial with many complications?? ...
What you do may not be so important, but it is very important that you do it well. (my variation of a saying by Gandhi)
Last edited: 23 October, 2011 - 13:31
Dick L.whichwatch at roadrunner dot com
Regards, Shing | email iwcforme1976 (at) gmail (dot) comtime does not change us. it just unfolds us. max frisch.all that really belongs to us is time; even he who has nothing else has that. baltasar gracian.
Last edited: 8 December, 2012 - 16:07
Last edited: 1 January, 2012 - 17:55
PaBlo Wrote in reply to:Simius Wrote:... I ask myself if such a great dial would attract less attention than a dial with many complications?? ...This is quite an interesting question. I think it implies that it is a good thing that a watch or a dial attracts attention, and that the watch or dial that attracts more attention than another watch or dial is to be preferred. A question that accompanies the issue is, whose attention is attracted, like the owner's attention, or someone else's attention. When I asked a colleague the other day whether he got a new watch, he answered with quite some satisfaction: no, but it is quite noticeable, isn't it.It is quite possible that the Portuguese Perpetual Calendar or the ceramic Da Vinci Chrono attract more attention from my colleagues and friends than the rose gold Vintage Collection Portuguese or the here shown Jubilee would. I am not sure whether I, would I own one of latter mentioned watches, would mind.Kind regards,Paul
Last edited: 13 April, 2013 - 14:58
Last edited: 29 March, 2012 - 21:17
Last edited: 5 February, 2014 - 18:46
Last edited: 1 December, 2012 - 16:00