5,020 Discussions and CommentsMember since May 29, 2003Sarasota, FL,
United States
Good choice Tonny. I always enjoyed this watch whenever Bill wore it...which was often. Can't go wrong with a PPC. and like Kevin, Christmas is early this year.
TONNY B Wrote:Told my wife it was an early chistmas gift to myself.
Does that work?!!
Congratulations on a great acquisition.
+1!
+1!
Congratulations, Tonny!
Regards,
Jeronimo
Omar Khayyám (Persia XI-XII Century) offered that Time should not only be measured in length but also in width due to the intrinsic difference between a minute or other depending on what is happening to the beholder... I wonder how a watch would look like...
735 Discussions and CommentsMember since July 12, 2011
Norway
andy stevens Wrote:Tonny...nice pick-up. CONGRATS !!
Would like to join the PC crowd one day. Perhaps IWC could offer a 42mm version for us "wrist size" challenged admirers.
Andy
First of all a big congrats Tonny - you chose the exact timepiece that drew me to IWC in the first place. Your new watch's brother says hi from Norway (older picture): PS! I really love that sparkling sky of the 5022 too, especially after hearing how difficult it was for IWC to manufacure that stone - so much in fact that they gave it up for the 5023!
Andy - you are in luck my friend, if you can find a 5022 they are indeed 42,3mm (as opposed to the 5023 at 44,1mm) - so now you have no excuse - LoL :-)
KS Low
Join us at the IWC Collectors Club South East Asia/Australia
Last edited: 16 November, 2012 - 02:15
+1!
+1!
Congratulations, Tonny!
Regards,
Jeronimo
Omar Khayyám (Persia XI-XII Century) offered that Time should not only be measured in length but also in width due to the intrinsic difference between a minute or other depending on what is happening to the beholder... I wonder how a watch would look like...
Last edited: 7 March, 2013 - 19:31
regards,
thang
iwcforummer@outlook.com
Last edited: 21 April, 2013 - 08:55
Would like to join the PC crowd one day. Perhaps IWC could offer a 42mm version for us "wrist size" challenged admirers.
Andy
Regards,
Ardoise
First of all a big congrats Tonny - you chose the exact timepiece that drew me to IWC in the first place. Your new watch's brother says hi from Norway (older picture):
PS! I really love that sparkling sky of the 5022 too, especially after hearing how difficult it was for IWC to manufacure that stone - so much in fact that they gave it up for the 5023!
Andy - you are in luck my friend, if you can find a 5022 they are indeed 42,3mm (as opposed to the 5023 at 44,1mm) - so now you have no excuse - LoL :-)
Skule
This is one fine choice- you can be very happy, for sure!
Nelson