58 Discussions and CommentsMember since Jan. 9, 2007Washington, DC,
United States
Mark1958 Wrote:I have a new watch in contention. It is a Dornblueth 99.3.
If you are considering the Dornblueth 99.3, then you should really go with the 5001 IMHO. They have a similar dial setup, but the Dornblueth is based on an ETA Unitas movement as opposed to the 5001 which has an in-house caliber with a seven day power reserve. From what I've seen the Dornblueth is almost $10K which is quite expensive for an ETA movement. I think the 5001 is a little more understated and definitely more iconic design...Again my humble opinion. Good luck!
40 Discussions and CommentsMember since Nov. 27, 2012
United States
My understanding is the Donbluth is highly highly modified from ETA. I guess the question is when does one consider something in house vs highly modified. I am not sure of the dividing line. ALmost everything is based on a modification from something earlier.
With respect, when you claim "ALmost everything is based on a modification from something earlier" you're talking yourself into something. Surely that doesn't mean all bets are off, and all movements should be equally valued.
One problem I have with all "boutique" watch companies is whether they'll be here in 20 or 30 years, and how I'll fare with spare parts, let alone repairs. But that's just me I guess.
85 Discussions and CommentsMember since Feb. 3, 2011
You are choosing between three beautiful and different watches in my opinion. I guess it will ultimately come down to what you like. The 5001 (which I own) is a little thick in the case, but as another member mentioned, can be worn many different ways. Something tells me that no matter which you choose, it won't be your last. Have you tried all three on yet?
40 Discussions and CommentsMember since Nov. 27, 2012
United States
Michael and Joe Please do not misinterpret what I was trying to say. First, I love the IWC watches--- I have tried them on but because i have a narrow wrist-- hard to try on the steel bracelet watches because too big. The portofino hand wound even though a large diameter watch felt good. I think the thin nature and design was responsible. The 5001 is beautiful but I really was trying for one watch a bit thiner.
In terms of the movement -- during my recent reading-- I was just trying to understand when something is considered in house. In other words what is the definition.... seems like some of these movements are in the grey zone. To me that is not the most important factor. The functionality of the movement--- accuracy etc are more important to me.
In terms of staying in business etc etc.. that is something i have thought of and considered.
85 Discussions and CommentsMember since Feb. 3, 2011
Mark1958 Wrote:Michael and Joe Please do not misinterpret what I was trying to say. First, I love the IWC watches--- I have tried them on but because i have a narrow wrist-- hard to try on the steel bracelet watches because too big. The portofino hand wound even though a large diameter watch felt good. I think the thin nature and design was responsible. The 5001 is beautiful but I really was trying for one watch a bit thiner.
In terms of the movement -- during my recent reading-- I was just trying to understand when something is considered in house. In other words what is the definition.... seems like some of these movements are in the grey zone. To me that is not the most important factor. The functionality of the movement--- accuracy etc are more important to me.
In terms of staying in business etc etc.. that is something i have thought of and considered.
I think you misunderstood what I was saying(which is no biggie).I don't think you were knocking the 5001 or any of the other two. I was just pointing out that if you like all three, you make end up buying one then wanting to buy another, then another : ). When I asked, "How can you not like it", I didn't really mean "You".
good luck - no matter what you won't lose... all great watches.
regards,
thang
iwcforummer@outlook.com
Last edited: 21 April, 2013 - 08:55
Hard to improve on that one. No wonder the 3714 has stayed in production for so long. No mistaking that iconic look. One of IWC's "classic" best !
If you are considering the Dornblueth 99.3, then you should really go with the 5001 IMHO. They have a similar dial setup, but the Dornblueth is based on an ETA Unitas movement as opposed to the 5001 which has an in-house caliber with a seven day power reserve. From what I've seen the Dornblueth is almost $10K which is quite expensive for an ETA movement. I think the 5001 is a little more understated and definitely more iconic design...Again my humble opinion.
Good luck!
WD
One problem I have with all "boutique" watch companies is whether they'll be here in 20 or 30 years, and how I'll fare with spare parts, let alone repairs. But that's just me I guess.
Regards, Michael
mfriedberg@iwcforum.com
Ps. I love my 5001. I mean how can you not?
Joe
Please do not misinterpret what I was trying to say. First, I love the IWC watches--- I have tried them on but because i have a narrow wrist-- hard to try on the steel bracelet watches because too big. The portofino hand wound even though a large diameter watch felt good. I think the thin nature and design was responsible. The 5001 is beautiful but I really was trying for one watch a bit thiner.
In terms of the movement -- during my recent reading-- I was just trying to understand when something is considered in house. In other words what is the definition.... seems like some of these movements are in the grey zone. To me that is not the most important factor. The functionality of the movement--- accuracy etc are more important to me.
In terms of staying in business etc etc.. that is something i have thought of and considered.
Last edited: 18 January, 2013 - 03:07
I think you misunderstood what I was saying(which is no biggie).I don't think you were knocking the 5001 or any of the other two. I was just pointing out that if you like all three, you make end up buying one then wanting to buy another, then another : ). When I asked, "How can you not like it", I didn't really mean "You".
Joe