flyrobyfly36 Wrote:That's why I always think the watch itself, not the brand nor the name of the model nor anything else might take my attention away from the intrinsical qualities of the watch.
Regards, Shing | email iwcforme1976 (at) gmail (dot) comtime does not change us. it just unfolds us. max frisch.all that really belongs to us is time; even he who has nothing else has that. baltasar gracian.
Alan Ross Wrote:@David,I am not buying the analogies you present. They work both ways. For example, there are certain cars I would not buy no matter how fast they are because I don't like the way they look. Same with an off road vehicle. Same for watches. If I like the way it looks I'll overlook the antimagnetic shortcomings. And if its ugly ( to my eyes) it could withstand the pull of the North Pole but I won't own it.
You come from nothing, you go back to nothing. What have you lost? Nothing!
Last edited: 31 January, 2013 - 15:22
Last edited: 10 September, 2014 - 10:05
Last edited: 1 February, 2013 - 17:28
Vahalis Wrote:Of course it's marketing and we all fell for it more or less. At least, I did. But, what does Ingenieur mean? IWC answered that question some time ago ;)
Last edited: 4 November, 2014 - 19:30
Michael Friedberg Wrote:Two quick comments:Roberto and Shing --I do consider brand when looking at a watch. I think some brands represent quality; I'm not just buying a name.Regulateur --I didn't know that today's IWC's amagnetic only have half of a Faraday cage, with no soft iron dial. Without further data, to my knowledge that's not true. The new Ingemieur Automatic is resistant to 40,000 A/m, and to my knowledge that's simply impossible is the watch is not protected at all on the front half.
regulateur Wrote in reply to:Alan Ross Wrote:@David,I am not buying the analogies you present. They work both ways. For example, there are certain cars I would not buy no matter how fast they are because I don't like the way they look. Same with an off road vehicle. Same for watches. If I like the way it looks I'll overlook the antimagnetic shortcomings. And if its ugly ( to my eyes) it could withstand the pull of the North Pole but I won't own it. Well, Alan - for some people only the look or design matters. For some others, the real values and features matter, too. I am not a person who can afford to buy a new luxury watch any time I'd like or if I get bored looking at the ones I already have, so the consideration of all aspects matters. The watch has to mean something to me, not only look nice. And for most car buyers, I guess the values matter, too.
Last edited: 6 February, 2014 - 05:40
Alan Ross Wrote:Well you certainly twisted that around. LOLI never said I "only" look at the design. To the contrary, I look at all the "real values and features". But the watch still has to look good.I don't know why you assume that I buy a new luxury watch any time I like or get bored with watches I have. This is nonsense.
regulateur Wrote:Michael, this is the information I got from customer service at IWC one year ago. Some design features of dials like the sunbeam effect can't be produced on dials made out of soft iron, I was told.
Michael Friedberg Wrote:It's obvious your information couldn't then apply to the new Ingenieur automatics, which neither have sunburst dials nor existed a year ago. The watches with sunburst dials, like last year's pilot's chrono. were never presented as being amagnetic nor with Faraday cages. It's true --those dials aren't soft iron-- but there are no half Faraday cages.