Cheers Greg ChalkCvanwhite at aol dot com
Last edited: 23 March, 2014 - 16:57
Last edited: 1 February, 2013 - 17:28
Michael Friedberg Wrote:Far be it from me to tell anyone how to run their business, but to me the trick would be to replace the entry level segment with a new in-house movement that could be slightly more, but not say almost double in price. That may not be possible, however, without compromising quality.
Last edited: 30 January, 2013 - 10:19
The UK Greg Wrote:To qualify for Geneva Seal over 50% of the cost of production would have to be done in the Canton of Geneva plus other manufacturing criteria which I am sure IWC could comply with. So in short it will not happen until IWC relocates to the Canton of Geneva.
MARIAN42 Wrote:Well, for me not having the Geneve seal simply belong to the the qoute "IWC is different". I like it the way without it, similarly to the fact of not having the chronometer seal. Because "we" go further than that :o) And for Geneve also geographically ;o)
Live long and prosper
ShaneIwc Wrote:Personally I think it would be a mistake to move away from the entry level models with the non in house (ETA) movements, as I think it will stop a lot of novices from falling in love with IWC in the first place and therefore affect their long term viability. My first IWC was a Portofino with an ETA movement, I now own 17 IWC's with a mix of in house and outsourced movements, if it wasn't for my first Portofino I might never have purchased an IWC ( but then again I have wanted a Da Vinci PPC since I was a kid) so I might still be an IWCAHOLIC.
Dick L.whichwatch at roadrunner dot com
Best regards,Jim"We are the other people, we are the other people...you're the other people too!" Frank Zappa
Monday to Friday 8:00am-7:00pm (CST)