What you do may not be so important, but it is very important that you do it well. (my variation of a saying by Gandhi)
Last edited: 23 December, 2013 - 10:26
Sunflower Wrote:I keep thinking that IWC didn't and doesn't understand women, or at least watches for women. Kind regards,Paul
Sinclair Wrote:Handwound?How do you wind that beauty? Sorry, but I don't see a crown...Greetings to Bern from SH, have a good weekend!
Time flies, Passion stays !
Last edited: 2 April, 2014 - 06:49
Ralph Ehrismann Wrote:I dont think, this watch is original IWC. It seems it got later some add-ons (diamonds), for me the watch look somehow odd.Behind is a steel (whitegold ?) manual wind watch.It is toos small to cary an c.44.The original Ref 98xx, built in the 60's looks much more smooth.Sorry, this is just my private oppinion.There where similar watches. But much better organized ....Here a page from the 1966 catalogregardsRalph
Simius Wrote:I think that's really a winner- a lady's vintage handwound model...still, to me it does not really fit into something that you would think to come from Schaffhausen..any better suggestions to bit this one??..
Sincerely, Kelvin Leung_______________________________________________________________________________________Repeat after me: I don't need another IWC, I really don't need another IWC...
Choose a job you love and you will never have to work a day in your life.....Confucius
Last edited: 11 May, 2013 - 06:36