Last edited: 9 May, 2014 - 13:14
Michael Friedberg Wrote:Paul --as a status report, about 2 weeks ago IWC had its big marketing meeting. I therefore waited until today to contact them with a question about "next steps", and I was told they'd consider the issues and get back to me in a few days.My thinking is that there can be some disclosure in the next two weeks. I also am thinking of reducing the number from 150 to 100 but that's not my decision.
Last edited: 11 July, 2014 - 20:51
If It Is To Be, It Is Up To Me!
Last edited: 23 July, 2013 - 15:46
Last edited: 1 September, 2013 - 10:42
JeronimoCG Wrote:... I'm a bit worried with the eventual reduction of the production run from 150 to 100... I hope that will be enough for our demand here. ...
What you do may not be so important, but it is very important that you do it well. (my variation of a saying by Gandhi)
"This man is dangerous. He winds his watch by hand." - from IWC Ads 70's
Last edited: 29 August, 2013 - 13:13
Sunflower Wrote in reply to:JeronimoCG Wrote:... I'm a bit worried with the eventual reduction of the production run from 150 to 100... I hope that will be enough for our demand here. ...Maybe it would help to build up some picture to know how many people posted more than 10 posts here in 2013. I am too lazy and no fool, I will not attempt a count. But maybe Michael could know with the use of some function in the forum control software. My guess would be about 80 people, but this guess could be so horribly off. But if right, it could be an indication that 100 CFW3 watches could be viable, if the watch is a real want-to-have.Kind regards,Paul