clepsydra Wrote:Here is the dial in question. I would love to hear the opinion of others.I must confess that I am puzzeled. Not the first time, it has been known to happen. :-)
Last edited: 13 August, 2013 - 14:18
Last edited: 25 February, 2015 - 17:29
andy stevens Wrote in reply to:clepsydra Wrote:Here is the dial in question. I would love to hear the opinion of others.I must confess that I am puzzeled. Not the first time, it has been known to happen. :-)Unfortunately I cannot comment on the matter as I lack the education to do so. I do however have a personal interest question.Is the dial leaning against a Zeiss Loupe ? If so, does it contain two different magnification power lenses? Your reply is appreciated.Regards,Andy
Last edited: 15 January, 2014 - 23:53
oneredtrim Wrote: The artwork is out wildly but it would be if it is one of those high quality faux enamel types from the mid-60's (different barometer), which i've only ever seen teamed with a gold body (bodes well for the furniture). There maybe an under dial flange kicking around somewhere.
You can't always get what you want, but if you try sometime you find, you get what you need. Keith Richards, Mick Jagger.
Last edited: 22 July, 2016 - 18:33
clepsydra Wrote:I was not entirely sure but ORT should know.The hypothesis that it is a dial for a regular IWC with cal 85xx repainted and the AUTOMATIC replaced by INGENIEUR seems to be the most likely.
JimmyR Wrote:I enlarged the picture of the back of the dial, are the dial feet missing, have they been removed, or is it just my imagination?RegardsJimmy
Monday to Friday 8:00am-7:00pm (CST)
Saturday 9:00am-5:30pm (CST)Sundays Closed